Quantcast
Channel: SB Nation - Los Angeles Kings
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2313

Behind The Numbers - Advanced Stats Game #21 Canucks vs. Sharks

$
0
0

A look at the scoring chance summary, on-ice scoring chances, team scoring chances, neutral zone stats, & the expected score from the Canucks 2-1 ot loss to the Sharks .

TEAM SCORING CHANCE TOTALS

Period

Totals

EV

PP

SH

VAN

SJS

VAN

SJS

VAN

SJS

VAN

SJS

1

6

4

6

2

0

2

0

0

2

7

3

4

3

3

0

0

0

3

6

5

6

5

0

0

0

0

OVR

19

13

16

10

2

0

0

0

  • Good News:
  • The Canucks played a great game! They clearly won the chance battle.
  • This was by far the Sharks worse chance differential of the year.
  • The Canucks started strongly again but couldn't finish on their chances.
  • Bad News: None. The Canucks were terrific against strong opposition.
  • They should have won the game and were the better team on the night.
  • Ultimately the game was decided by a lucky bounce, and a ridiculous penalty call.
  • COMPLETE SCORING CHANCE SUMMARY

    TeamPeriodTimeNoteHomeAwayState
    Home117:39Booth backhand from Kassian, miss137915185892731835v5
    Home114:57Tanev from Richardson, save12789155892731835v5
    Home114:19Richardson - ms deflection137151821578931835v5
    Home112:24Santorelli from Higgins, save128142025512273139815v5
    Away111:09Sheppard deflection from Desjardins, save12789151015223143445v5
    Away17:46Thornton one-timer from Marleau, goalpost (5v4 PP)1281525812192231394v5
    Away17:31Pavelski jam play, save (5v4 PP)1281525812192231394v5
    Home15:15H. Sedin from Burrows, save1314182233815223143445v5
    Home15:15H. Sedin - rush1314182233815223143445v5
    Away13:11Couture from Kennedy, save1379151858152731435v5
    Home215:23Higgins from Burrows, miss128142025512273139815v5
    Away212:15Thornton from Hertl, miss12781720719314448815v5
    Home210:55Kesler from D. Sedin, save (5v4 PP)1231722337123157615v4
    Home29:12H. Sedin one-timer from Edler, miss15142023251222313944815v5
    Away27:34Vlasic from Thornton, save (4v4)1231720591931444v4
    Away26:55Couture off turnover, save (4v4)152223337313957614v4
    Home26:31Burrows one-timer from H. Sedin, miss (5v4 PP)1231422337123161835v4
    Home26:31Burrows - ms - pp1231422337123161835v4
    Home25:51Richardson17891518815223143445v5
    Home24:53Kesler from D. Sedin, save128172233512273139815v5
    Home318:48Higgins from Tanev, save128142025812223139445v5
    Home318:42Higgins128142025812223139445v5
    Away316:24Couture one-timer from Marleau, save12814202578123139615v5
    Home311:53Burrows from Higgins, save1514202325731434857615v5
    Away310:35Couture deflection from Marleau, miss128152025812223139445v5
    Home39:44H. Sedin ms1322233319223144484v4
    Away37:43Sheppard, save157142325715314361815v5
    Home34:48Burrows - ms12814202558122731395v5
    Home32:25Burrows backhand from Higgins, save12814202578123139615v5
    Away31:05Hertl - (goal)151420232578123139615v5
    Away30:23McCarthy1281722331522314344815v5
    Away42:22Boyle (4 on 3)InvalidData

    CANUCK ON-ICE SCORING CHANCES FOR AND AGAINST

    #PlayerEVPPSH
    1LUONGO, ROBERTO16103002
    2HAMHUIS, DAN20:278602:053003:0802
    3BIEKSA, KEVIN18:405201:523001:4900
    5GARRISON, JASON16:482300:380000:5300
    7BOOTH, DAVID12:044400:000000:0000
    8TANEV, CHRISTOPHER19:489500:000003:2202
    9KASSIAN, ZACK10:553200:000000:0000
    14BURROWS, ALEXANDRE15:5010300:512000:0000
    15RICHARDSON, BRAD11:294300:000003:0302
    17KESLER, RYAN19:021301:391002:3700
    18STANTON, RYAN12:345100:000000:0000
    20HIGGINS, CHRIS18:338500:210001:3800
    21DALPE, ZAC04:161000:000000:0000
    22SEDIN, DANIEL21:244202:093000:3000
    23EDLER, ALEXANDER21:523300:250000:3900
    25SANTORELLI, MIKE15:518400:210002:0402
    33SEDIN, HENRIK21:324202:093000:3000

  • The Canucks 2nd line was 'crazy good' once again!
  • Alex Burrows, Chris Higgins and Mike Santorelli were a terrific 26-12 in SCD at ES.
  • As I said last time, Burrows is definitely well overdue to score.
  • Ryan Stanton and Kevin Bieksa were the best D-men. they were 10 -3 in SCD at ES.
  • Conversely, Logan Couture and Joe Pavalski had really tough nights.
  • The two top centers were a combined 8 -18 in SCD at ES.
  • No Shark tood out in terms of SCD.
  • Statistical Three Stars:

    1. Anti Neimi {+2. rating)
    2. Kevin Bieksa
    3. The Canucks 2nd Line (The trio had an 60% Pos. F)

    OFFENSIVE ZONE ENTRY SUCCESS RATE (OZE%) (Even Strength)

    Most Advanced stat analysis centers around the idea that possession of the puck is huge key to long term success. {Accordingly, Offensive Zone Exit Success Rate (OZE%) attempts to identify the skill of gaining puck possession in the opponents defensive zone}. Offensive Zone Exit Success Rate (OZE%) is expressed as a percentage-{Successful Possessions Gained ('Carry-ins'+'Dump-wins') / Total Attempts at entry}.


    VANCOUVER


    SAN JOSE


    Period

    Successful

    Attempted

    %

    Successful

    Attempted

    %

    1

    15

    30

    50%


    13

    29

    45%

    2

    16

    22

    72%


    8

    17

    47%

    3

    11

    21

    45%


    16

    33

    48%









    Total

    42

    73

    58%


    37

    79

    47%

    • The Canucks were the better team by OZE%.
    • Holding the Sharks under 50% OZE in each period was a huge achievement.
    • The Canucks sat back in the third period and allowed the Sharks to carry the play.
    • The Canucks had a high total of 26 successful 'carry ins'. And, 13 in the 2nd period.
    • The Canucks had 16 successful 'dump ins' (31 att.) for a season high rate of (52%).
    • The Canucks aggressive forecheck was extremely effective .
    • The Canucks won the puck battle game decisively!
    • San Jose also had a very high total of 32 'carry ins' - 17 in the 3rd period.
    • The Sharks had only 10 'dump in' wins out of 34 for only a rate of (29%).

    DEFENSIVE ZONE EXIT SUCCESS RATE (DZE%) (Even Strength)

    Most Advanced stat analysis centers around the idea that possession of the puck is huge key to long term success. {Accordingly, Defensive Zone Exit Success Rate (DZE%)attempts to identify the skill of exiting the defensive zone successful with possession}. Defensive Zone Exit Success Rate (DZE%) is expressed as a percentage-{Successful Exits with possession / Total Exits Attempts}.


    VANCOUVER


    SAN JOSE


    Period

    Successful

    Attempted

    %

    Successful

    Attempted

    %

    1

    15

    33

    45%


    11

    34

    43%

    2

    14

    28

    50%


    8

    28

    26%

    3

    12

    36

    33%


    12

    29

    43%









    Total

    41

    97

    42%


    31

    101

    30%

    • Neither team was above average in DZE%.
    • The very high turnover totals (see below) confirms this fact.
    • The Canucks were content to dump the puck out, when necessary, in the tird period.
    • The Sharks had a pitiful night moving the puck out of their zone with possession.
    • DZE% shows us that the Sharks are also vulnerable on the defence.
    • The Canucks forecheck confounded the Sharks and cause numerous turnovers (see below).

    EXPECTED SCORE

    {Expected Score is calculated by assigning an approximate percentage value to each shot attempt. It's goal is to capture a truer picture of the game}.


    VANCOUVER

    San Jose


    TOTAL EXP. SCORE= ES (PP) {SH}

    TOTAL EXP. SCORE= ES (PP) {SH}


    3.3 = 3.0 (.3) {0}

    2.5 = 1.9 (.6) {0}

    • Expected Score suggests the most likely outcome was Vancouver 3 - San Jose 2

    GOALTENDER RATING - EXPECTED GOALS AGAINST

    {Expected Goals Against is calculated by estimating an expected score value to every save made}.

    • Roberto Luongo had an Expected Goals Against {EGA} of ~ 2.3.
    • Luongo's rating was +.3.
    • Antti Neimi had an {EGA} of ~3.0.
    • Niemi's rating was +2.0.
    • The Sharks won the goaltending battle by nearly ~2 goals.

    TURNOVERS (EvenStrength)

    • Vancouver had a very high total of 27 turnovers.
    • The Canucks turnover rates is the single most concerning statistic of this team.
    • The Sharks had an even higher total of 33 turnovers.

    THE DECIDING FACTORS

    • The Sharks goaltending and luck were the key factors in the game.
    • The Canucks won every stat battle in the game.
    • Once again, the Canucks did not receive the penalty calls they deserved.
    • The Canucks are now -20 in Power play differential versus the Sharks in the last 8 games.
    • The Canucks rank 28th in power plays in the league with ~3/gm.
    • The Sharks are 1st. The Kings are 3rd. The Coyotes 6th. The Ducks 11th.
    • To put these numbers in perspective:
    • The Sharks have had more than 3 powerplays 12 times this year.
    • The Canucks only 4 times.
    • The better team ought to draw more penalties- it isn't happening enough in Canuck games.

    Finally, much has been said about how difficult the Canucks' division is. This is accurate. However, the Canucks are really improving as a team. In the last 5 games (4 on the road) they have bettered their Pacific Division rivals with ~57% Pos. F Close rating (103-79 in shot attempts).This is good news long term for Canuck fans, now it is time to get some calls and finish more scoring chances.

    Feel free to comment below!

    SHOTS ATTEMPTED CHART

    (courtesy of extraskater.com)

    Fenwick-graph-2013-11-14-sharks-canucks_medium


    Viewing all articles
    Browse latest Browse all 2313

    Trending Articles